Ask Forstrong:

Special Report

5 Key Questions Keeping Investors Up At Night

October 2024

2024 is proving to be another year full of surprises. Investors have been bracing for recession risk, political uncertainty and the usual seasonal weakness heading into the final stretch. Instead, what they got was a jumbo Fed cut, bazooka-style stimulus from Beijing and a full-blown risk-on rally in the third quarter. Who had any of that on their bingo card? 

But it was always going to unfold in a bumpy way. Investors are still navigating an economy adjusting to the shock of the largest public-to-private wealth transfer in history. These latest surprises, rather than signaling an inflection point, simply extend a long narrative: the post-pandemic cycle has been unlike any recent ones, breaking the reliability of traditional economic forecasting indicators. And it continues to do so. Take your pick from recession signals that turned out to be false alarms: inverted yield curves, aggressive rate hikes, manufacturing slumps, regional bank collapses, declining leading indicators and, for the most hardcore macro geeks, the triggered Sahm rule. Textbook macro remains stuck in a bear market. 

Meanwhile, the world is awash in new realities. Macro faultlines marble the entire globe. Forget about risks from fragmentation and rising protectionism, the three major economic blocs that can meaningfully move global growth are each grappling with their own internal challenges. In America, the public is fixated on what may be the most divisive presidential election in history, with an outcome that will hinge on a handful of voters in half a dozen states — and whose result is liable to be contested. Across the Atlantic, the Eurozone has lost access to its most important supplier of cheap energy and faces numerous other frailties, including the existential risk of becoming little more than an industrial museum (Mario Draghi, former ECB president, devotes 393 pages of sober reading in a recent report to this topic: see “Future Of European Competitiveness”). And then there’s China, where policymakers, apparently long content to do the bare minimum to support domestic growth, have finally signaled a major policy U-turn—and hardly anyone is buying it.

All of this has forged an easy fraternity for those predicting more macro doom. Global pessimism, as it has been in recent years, remains elevated. Investors have taken notice of the chaotic conditions, with our inbox overflowing with questions over the last month. The Forstrong team has also been busy engaging with many of our individual investors and institutional clients (while also recording podcasts from China, launching a new ETF on the Toronto Stock Exchange, and hosting our regular global investment roundtables in various cities). Below, we tackle the 5 most pressing questions we’ve received, aiming to help macro-minded investors make sense of the unfolding landscape and stay on track with their longer-term objectives. 

Question 1: I’m confused about where we are in the economic cycle. Shouldn’t we be in recession by now?

Many investors have been thrown off over the last few years by pandemic distortions, fruitlessly attempting to apply a traditional market-driven business cycle framework to current conditions. It has been anything but that. Today, most investors are framing economic conditions as “late cycle”. But are they really? If anything, we have already had recessionary conditions over the past two years in key segments of the economy like housing and durable goods. 

What’s more, sharp economic slowdowns occur when households and businesses get caught too far out on the risk curve and are forced to cut back quickly, triggering a self-reinforcing dynamic and a reflexive recessionary process. How do we get a recession when the world has spent the last 24 months hunkering down for a downturn that never came? It’s hard to get hurt jumping from a basement window.

Looking ahead, the recovery that started in the US is now spreading globally. Economic activity is firming, the cost of capital is falling and many global markets, left behind over the last few years, are quietly gaining momentum. Most importantly, corporate earnings, especially outside of America, are finally turning up. In short, the data — dare we say — increasingly points to an “early cycle” environment. Or, using the popular airplane analogy (since it seems to be the most common metaphor), the no-landing or even lift-off scenario remains the one investors should tilt asset mix toward. That means higher-than-average risk through pro-cyclical equity overweights, short fixed-income duration and a generous allocation to international assets.

Question 2: We seem to be getting more geopolitical shocks lately and “fragmentation” seems to be the buzzword. How should investors respond to this?

At a time when nearly every newsfeed reveals the world to be a dark place — whether by war in Ukraine, the Middle East or looming threats in geopolitical hotspots — many investors are running for the hills. Global money market funds have continued to swell and the investment newsletter business has been busy preying on the fear (you know who you are). But the first rule of investing is to never prepare for the end of the world: it only comes once and, when it does, nothing really matters anyway.

What does matter for investors? Timing geopolitical threats is speculative at best. But the grand canvas of geopolitics is changing and investors should recognize that the globalizing impulse that has defined the world economy for over two decades is now in rapid flux. New economic barriers between countries are choking the free and frictionless trade that once flowed across national borders. Yet, for all the hand-wringing about fragmentation, the world is not so much “de-globalizing” as it is reorganizing into regional blocs. Supply chains are increasingly centred around three major hubs — China, the EU and America. Emerging markets ex-China are also trading more with the rich world than ever before, but they have also added a huge amount of trade with China and each other. Despite the rhetoric, overall global trade has continued to rise. 

This trend raises big questions. Are these developments commodity and capex intensive? Without a doubt. New supply chains will require rebuilding new industrial infrastructure. Will there be winners and losers? Yes. Rising protectionism is largely a Western phenomenon, and tariffs benefit those not caught up in them. For instance, China’s current excess industrial capacity, which was a huge deflationary force upon the world in the 2000s, will now only provide disinflationary tailwinds to nations not involved in tariff disputes with the West. 

Finally, are investors prepared for this shift? Hardly. The dominant trend over the last few years has been a rush into cash and fixed income. But if we’re entering a longer-term inflationary period, marked by conflict, fragmentation, and supply shocks (rather than the demand-driven downturns over the last few decades), then developed market bonds won’t stabilize portfolios as they once did. Instead, they’ll amplify volatility. The diversifiers that investors will need are inflation rather than deflation hedges.

Question 3: The upcoming US presidential election seems like a major market risk. What should I know heading into November 5th?

Despite dramatic headlines, presidential elections have historically shown very weak actionable trends for markets. While profound differences exist between Trump’s populist, deregulation-focused agenda and Harris’ progressive stance on social justice, climate action, and economic equity, the US political system limits presidential power without congressional support. Every president since 1980 has faced a divided government. Gridlock again is the most likely result.

Yet, at a high level, three important questions need to be answered. First, will US monetary policy change? Likely not. But Trump now tells reporters that as President he will have direct say on when and how the Federal Reserve sets interest rates. In a surprise to no one, he claims his own instincts are better than the people who work at the Fed and that Powell will be fired if he doesn’t do the right thing (whatever that is). There is precedent for this. In 1972, Nixon was able to browbeat the Fed Chair into keeping rates low for political purposes. Such interference does risk negative consequences.  

Secondly, will US trade policy become less protectionist? Unlikely. Both parties are committed to aggressively pursuing protectionism, despite the fact that tariffs are economically illiterate, prescribing bilateral remedies for more complex problems. Consider that America’s massive trade deficit reflects imbalances with over 100 countries. In a world with globalized supply chains, slapping tariffs on other countries simply diverts trade to higher-cost foreign producers — the equivalent of a tax hike on US consumers, directly weakening consumption and increasing inflation. 

Finally, and most importantly, will fiscal policy change? The beneficiaries and relative size of federal largesse will change if the color of the administration changes (our investment team is actively mapping out different scenarios and sectors that will thrive under each presidential candidate). But whether Republican or Democrat, the US government is clearly committed to running massive budget deficits as far as the eye can see. This is the new normal. Notably, both parties support extending most of Trump’s 2017 tax cuts—a move the Congressional Budget Office estimates would add around 20%, or $4.6 trillion, to the deficit over the next decade.

All of the above adds up to a weakening American currency, at a time when the US dollar index is over-valued at comparable levels with past secular peaks in 1985 and 2002.

Question 4: Is the recent stimulus out of China a game changer for the country?

The world recently gave up on China. After enduring a three-year-long property bust and post-pandemic slump, many concluded that China’s economy was beyond repair, beset by geopolitical tensions, heavy-handed regulations and a looming Japanese-style deflationary spiral. This narrative led to global investors drastically under-weighting Chinese equities and the closing of China-focused funds. The term “un-investable” has become synonymous with China.  With local stock markets getting clobbered, most investors felt like they were on the right side of history.  

Until recently, it was hard to challenge this view. But change is afoot. China has recently rolled out a series of turnaround measures, including interest rate cuts, relaxed reserve requirements for banks, stock market support, and promises of fiscal stimulus. Are these fiscal measures super detailed? No. Will a sliver of a percentage point off interest rates turn the long-suffering property sector around? Not immediately. Will the Chinese government continue to prioritize market share and industrial self-sufficiency over profits? Almost certainly. 

But the key point is that Beijing has broken free of its policy paralysis. Authorities are now squarely focused on resetting expectations. Unlike Japan, there’s no structural reason for Chinese households and companies to stay in defensive mode indefinitely. Investors who fixate on the specifics of the stimulus are missing the larger point: the main issue is whether China is serious about short-circuiting the negativity and boosting confidence. We believe they are. As sentiment and positioning normalize, the quality of the interventions will matter more—but for now, the priority is to take left-tail risks off the table. Looking ahead, China’s stimulus will broaden the global cyclical recovery, extending it beyond a US-centric rebound. A range of emerging market equities, including cyclically-oriented equity sectors and commodity-exporting nations, are nowhere close to pricing any of this in. Forstrong’s emerging market equity ETF (TSX: FEME) is positioned to capture this new uptrend.

Question 5: The Magnificent 7 have had a stellar run but are now facing more volatility. What’s happening?

Since 2010, the S&P 500 has delivered nearly 600% in total returns, driven largely by robust US earnings and the outperformance of tech stocks. These top tech companies, responsible for nearly half of the S&P 500’s returns since 2010, are now trading at 30 times their expected earnings for the next year, fueled by excitement over AI. Most asset allocators are now fully mesmerized by mega-cap American tech companies and firmly committed to a structural overweight.

This is risky territory. High expectations make disappointments more likely, as seen when Nvidia shed a third of its value over six weeks on disappointing earnings. The key risk here relates to AI itself. Demand for AI chips could fall short of forecasts, making it harder for tech companies to justify their massive investments. Alternatively, non-tech companies might see a boost as AI improves their productivity, leading to a rise in their valuations. Historically, markets tend to overestimate returns for innovators and underestimate returns for users.

Today, global markets are concentrated in a single theme—AI and Big Tech. However, as the global business cycle accelerates, there’s an enormous opportunity for a shift away from these defensive growth stocks, which do better when growth is scarce and policy is restrictive. The start of Fed rate cuts and broadening profit growth globally will shift momentum toward small caps, value sectors, and cyclical segments of the market. With these assets trading at steep discounts, the potential upside is significant. At a minimum, it’s time for some rebalancing.

TYler MORDY

Chief Executive Officer & Chief Investment Officer

View profile

Disclaimers:

The information contained in these materials is for general informational purposes only and is intended to provide only brief comments on broad market, industry or sector trends, or other general economic or market conditions. It is not intended to provide an overview of the terms applicable to any products or funds managed or sponsored by Forstrong Global Asset Management Inc. (“Forstrong”). Views expressed regarding a particular company, security, industry, investment, or market sector are the views only of that individual as of the time expressed and do not necessarily represent the views of Forstrong or any other person in the Forstrong organization. These materials contain information and views as of the date indicated and such information and views are subject to change at any time without notice, based upon market and other conditions, and Forstrong disclaims any and all responsibility to update such information and views. These views are not and may not be relied upon as investment advice and, because investment decisions for a Forstrong fund or product are based on numerous factors, are not and should not be relied upon as an indication of trading intent on behalf of any Forstrong fund or product. Any opinion or assumption may contain elements of subjective judgment and are not intended to imply, nor should be interpreted as conveying, any form of guarantee or assurance by Forstrong of any future action or performance. Neither Forstrong nor any of its affiliates, businesses, or representatives make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, completeness, appropriateness, or sufficiency for any purpose of any information contained herein. Forstrong and its affiliates and related entities disclaim any and all liability relating to the information herein, including, without limitation, any express or implied representations or warranties for, statements contained in, and omissions from, the information. Forstrong and its affiliates and related entities are not liable for any errors or omissions in any information herein or for any loss or damage suffered, whether direct or consequential, resulting from the use of these materials.

The information contained in these materials is strictly for general illustrative, educational, or informational purposes, and is not intended to provide legal, investment, accounting, or tax advice, and should not be relied upon in that regard. These materials contain information and views as of the date indicated and such information and views are subject to change at any time without notice, based upon market and other conditions, and Forstrong disclaims any and all responsibility to update such information and views. These views are not and may not be relied upon as investment advice. Any opinion or assumption may contain elements of subjective judgment and are not intended to imply, nor should be interpreted as conveying, any form of guarantee or assurance by Forstrong of any future action or performance. Neither Forstrong nor any of its affiliates, businesses, or representatives make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to the accuracy, reliability, completeness, appropriateness, or sufficiency for any purpose of any information contained herein. Forstrong and its affiliates and related entities disclaim any and all liability relating to the information herein, including, without limitation, any express or implied representations or warranties for, statements contained in, and omissions from, the information. Forstrong and its affiliates and related entities are not liable for any errors or omissions in any information herein or for any loss or damage suffered, whether direct or consequential, resulting from the use of these materials.

Any specific companies, issuers, funds, ETFs, or indices mentioned are for illustrative or educational purposes only and are not and shall not be deemed to be a recommendation to buy or sell any securities. Any companies, issuers, funds, or ETFs mentioned do not necessarily represent current or future holdings of any Forstrong funds or products. Any strategies discussed are strictly for illustrative and educational purposes and are not a recommendation, offer, or solicitation to buy or sell any securities or to adopt any investment strategy. There is no guarantee that any strategies discussed will be effective.

Commissions, fees, and expenses may be associated with investments in Forstrong funds, ETFs, and/or other investment products. Please read a fund’s offering memorandum or ETF’s prospectus, as applicable, which contains detailed information, and speak to an advisor before investing. Funds and ETFs are not guaranteed, their values change frequently, and investors may experience a gain or loss. Past performance may not be repeated.

Certain statements in these materials may contain forward-looking statements or forward-looking information that are predictive in nature and may include words such as “expects”, “anticipates”, “intends”, “plans”, believes”, “estimates”, and similar forward-looking expressions or negative versions thereof. Such forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and projections about future general economic, political, and other relevant market factors, such as interest, and assuming no changes to applicable tax or other laws or regulations. Expectations and projections about future events are inherently subject to, among other things, risks and uncertainties, some of which may be unforeseeable and, accordingly, may prove to be incorrect at a future date. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance, and actual events could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements. A number of important factors can contribute to these differences, including, but not limited to, general economic, political, and market factors in Canada and internationally, interest and foreign exchange rates, global equity and capital markets, business competition, and catastrophic events. You should avoid placing any undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Past performance is no indicator of future performance and the materials are not intended to forecast or predict future events. Forstrong disclaims any and all responsibility to update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, or otherwise, except as specifically required by law.

The information contained herein is presented solely for illustrative purposes and should not be construed as a forecast or projection. While some information used herein has been obtained from various published and unpublished third-party sources considered to be reliable, such information has not been independently verified by Forstrong (and Forstrong disclaims any obligation to verify) and Forstrong does not guarantee its accuracy or completeness and accepts no liability for any loss or damage suffered, whether direct or consequential, resulting from its use. It should be noted that data provided may be approximate numbers.

Forstrong Global® and the Forstrong Global® logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Forstrong Global Asset Management Inc. in Canada.

© 2024 Forstrong Global Asset Management Inc. All rights reserved.

Share This